<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments for</title> <atom:link href="http://chrisplaneta.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chrisplaneta.com</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Comment on Internet Explorer with disabled Javascript vs Modernizr and HTML5 shiv by Mark</title><link>http://chrisplaneta.com/blog/ie-without-javascript-vs-modernizr-shiv/#comment-568</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:54:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chrisplaneta.com/?p=383#comment-568</guid> <description>But ... let&#039;s be reasonable. Chaos is due to an outcome of the universal handicap applied by the human culture of opulence. For at least two generations, card-carrying PhD&#039;s have bred governments, multinational hospital groups and like computer driven human enterprise to specialize ms[class] dependence on system isolation. Windows&#039; economy is a feature isolation tool. Home desktops are a civil [public test tube] gift, no more and no less. Interesting to note at W3c that IE9 use is down lower than the low teens last month in market percentage. Even the staunch Microsoft Expression supporters live by htmlshiv, modernizr, and the like. A certain magelomaniac monlith is going to have to change its market policy, if the gift is to become a reliable public attachment. Rapidly failing market may help. Or not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But &#8230; let&#8217;s be reasonable. Chaos is due to an outcome of the universal handicap applied by the human culture of opulence. For at least two generations, card-carrying PhD&#8217;s have bred governments, multinational hospital groups and like computer driven human enterprise to specialize ms[class] dependence on system isolation. Windows&#8217; economy is a feature isolation tool. Home desktops are a civil [public test tube] gift, no more and no less. Interesting to note at W3c that IE9 use is down lower than the low teens last month in market percentage. Even the staunch Microsoft Expression supporters live by htmlshiv, modernizr, and the like. A certain magelomaniac monlith is going to have to change its market policy, if the gift is to become a reliable public attachment. Rapidly failing market may help. Or not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Internet Explorer with disabled Javascript vs Modernizr and HTML5 shiv by Mark</title><link>http://chrisplaneta.com/blog/ie-without-javascript-vs-modernizr-shiv/#comment-567</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:17:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chrisplaneta.com/?p=383#comment-567</guid> <description>Yeah, well okay, so we thought about this and ran some tests. This kind of degradation risks effecting duplication in html5 capable browsers targetted by the shim, having javascript turned on when visiting, and div capable. ... Say your nav tag is indented 10%, then by the time it gets through the proper html5 tag and the proper html4 div, you&#039;ve got a 20% indent. ... It gets worse than that. IE9, thinking it is on steroids, trips out of a leading header tag (in one of our tests) and creates two (2) nav blocks, the first block empty.
nav {/*border-radius here*/}
div #nav {margin-left 5%; margin-right:-5%;}
This is safe. But given confirmed IE9 instability, I would say Microsoft is still flushing standards down the toilet. Toilet$ make money, standards are worthless. Frankly, worrying a browser might have script turned off is like being afraid lightening might strike your keybaord. Has that ever happened to you, reader? Point taken by all. I bitched Expression Team yesterday, to get off their butts and script a decent shim for all browsers subjected to the chaos their marketing has created. I would not hold my breath if I were you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, well okay, so we thought about this and ran some tests. This kind of degradation risks effecting duplication in html5 capable browsers targetted by the shim, having javascript turned on when visiting, and div capable. &#8230; Say your nav tag is indented 10%, then by the time it gets through the proper html5 tag and the proper html4 div, you&#8217;ve got a 20% indent. &#8230; It gets worse than that. IE9, thinking it is on steroids, trips out of a leading header tag (in one of our tests) and creates two (2) nav blocks, the first block empty.<br
/> nav {/*border-radius here*/}<br
/> div #nav {margin-left 5%; margin-right:-5%;}<br
/> This is safe. But given confirmed IE9 instability, I would say Microsoft is still flushing standards down the toilet. Toilet$ make money, standards are worthless. Frankly, worrying a browser might have script turned off is like being afraid lightening might strike your keybaord. Has that ever happened to you, reader? Point taken by all. I bitched Expression Team yesterday, to get off their butts and script a decent shim for all browsers subjected to the chaos their marketing has created. I would not hold my breath if I were you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on WooCommerce review by Tim</title><link>http://chrisplaneta.com/blog/woocommerce-review/#comment-566</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:22:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chrisplaneta.com/?p=840#comment-566</guid> <description>Thanks for the reviews Chris. Some very good insights and helpful to those of us who are planning their first store.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reviews Chris. Some very good insights and helpful to those of us who are planning their first store.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Cornerstone &#8211; nude Opencart theme by Chris Planeta</title><link>http://chrisplaneta.com/freebies/cornerstone-nude-opencart-theme/#comment-558</link> <dc:creator>Chris Planeta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:37:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chrisplaneta.com/?p=584#comment-558</guid> <description>No, it doesn&#039;t work with 1.5. Now, when 1.6 is on the way I will wait until its out and release a new version. This time with long support.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it doesn&#8217;t work with 1.5. Now, when 1.6 is on the way I will wait until its out and release a new version. This time with long support.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Cornerstone &#8211; nude Opencart theme by Derek</title><link>http://chrisplaneta.com/freebies/cornerstone-nude-opencart-theme/#comment-557</link> <dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:07:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://chrisplaneta.com/?p=584#comment-557</guid> <description>Upon installing cornerstone in OC v1.5, I have received the following error:&quot;Notice: Error: Could not load template /home/pixelink/public_html/midnightgarage.net/catalog/view/theme/default/template/module/slideshow.tpl! in /home/pixelink/public_html/midnightgarage.net/system/engine/controller.php on line 71&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon installing cornerstone in OC v1.5, I have received the following error:</p><p>&#8220;Notice: Error: Could not load template /home/pixelink/public_html/midnightgarage.net/catalog/view/theme/default/template/module/slideshow.tpl! in /home/pixelink/public_html/midnightgarage.net/system/engine/controller.php on line 71&#8243;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 310/320 objects using disk: basic

Served from: chrisplaneta.com @ 2012-02-23 04:50:43 -->
